![]() ![]() Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that sanctions including any form of criminal punishment to all forms of private, consensual non- procreative adult sexual activities between two individuals (commonly referred to as sodomy laws) are unconstitutional. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings Kennedy, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer Hardwick overruled.Ĭhief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices John P. Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas reversed and remanded. The Texas statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct violates the Due Process Clause. Whether the petitioners' criminal convictions for adult consensual sexual intimacy in their home violate their vital interests in liberty and privacy protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ģ. Whether the petitioners' criminal convictions under the Texas "Homosexual Conduct" law-which criminalizes sexual intimacy by same-sex couples, but not identical behavior by different-sex couples-violate the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection of the laws Ģ. S 427ĭefendants convicted, Harris County Criminal Court (1999), rev'd, 2000 WL 729417 ( Tex. Service 5559 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7036 16 Fla.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |